Development Social Science in medical journals: diagnosis is caveat emptor

The following two tabs change content below.
Tweet about this on Twitter1Share on Facebook0Email this to someone

Aid Watch has complained before about shaky social science analysis or shaky numbers published in medical journals, which were then featured in major news stories. We questioned creative data on stillbirths, a study on health aid, and another on maternal mortality.Just this week, yet another medical journal article got headlines for giving us the number of women raped in the DR Congo (standard headline: a rape a minute). The study applied country-wide a 2007 estimate of the rate of sexual violence in a small sample (of unknown and undiscussed bias). It did this using female  population by province and age-cohort  — in a country whose last census was in 1984.

Go here to see the original:
Development Social Science in medical journals: diagnosis is caveat emptor